Showing posts with label exist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exist. Show all posts

Monday, March 19, 2012

Failed insert via Enterprise Manager

Hey guys..

Trying to insert a row via Enterprise Manager I get "object does not exist" error.. However it works on another server?!?

The table name is aa.aabc .. So i know what the problem is.. it thinks that aa is the owner.. I can insert using query analyzer by using the following syntax: insert into [aa.aabc] ... but it fails using: insert into aa.abc .. for obvious reasons..

I'm guessing it has something to do with the differences in the server config between the 2 servers as to why one server you can insert via enterprise manager and the other you cant..

The collation is different as the ANSI warning and padding in the connection info..

Can anyone else help me fix this problem, so that I can insert using enterprise manager?

CheersINSERT into EM Where?|||Databases --> Databasename --> Tables --> Tablename --> Return all rows.. Then you can scroll to the bottom row and insert in a similar way to access..

THanks

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Extracting RDL file from published reports in RS 2000

In order to have a backup of the rdl files for reporting, does exist a manner
to extract the rdl files inside RS starting from published reports?
In other terms, is it possible to revert the report publishing process in
order to have the rdl files?
Many thanksOn Sep 11, 3:44 am, Pasquale <Pasqu...@.discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote:
> In order to have a backup of the rdl files for reporting, does exist a manner
> to extract the rdl files inside RS starting from published reports?
> In other terms, is it possible to revert the report publishing process in
> order to have the rdl files?
> Many thanks
Try this application, works great for me. http://sqldbatips.com/showarticle.asp?ID=62|||Oh, well! It's very useful.
Many thanks
"Tim Toennies" wrote:
> On Sep 11, 3:44 am, Pasquale <Pasqu...@.discussions.microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > In order to have a backup of the rdl files for reporting, does exist a manner
> > to extract the rdl files inside RS starting from published reports?
> > In other terms, is it possible to revert the report publishing process in
> > order to have the rdl files?
> > Many thanks
> Try this application, works great for me. http://sqldbatips.com/showarticle.asp?ID=62
>

extracting from 2 tables what doesn't exist in both

what is the best way of extracting just the rows that existing in both table
s
that are not common to both.
I guess one way might be to firstly populate another table with what does
exist in both tables and then delete from that table what does exist in
table1 and you then have what exists in table1 but not in table2, then repea
t
process for table2.
this just seems incredibly clumsy and I'm sure there is probably a far
better way to code this.
your help much appreciated.Try,
select *
from
(
select t1.c1, ..., t1.cn
from t1 left join t2
on t1.pk = t2.pk
where t2.pk is null
union
select t2.c1, ..., t2.cn
from t1 right join t2
on t1.pk = t2.pk
where t1.pk is null
)
) as t
If do not mind about duplicated rows, then use "union all" instead.
AMB
"sysbox27" wrote:

> what is the best way of extracting just the rows that existing in both tab
les
> that are not common to both.
> I guess one way might be to firstly populate another table with what does
> exist in both tables and then delete from that table what does exist in
> table1 and you then have what exists in table1 but not in table2, then rep
eat
> process for table2.
> this just seems incredibly clumsy and I'm sure there is probably a far
> better way to code this.
> your help much appreciated.
>

extracting from 2 tables what doesn't exist in both

what is the best way of extracting just the rows that existing in both tables
that are not common to both.
I guess one way might be to firstly populate another table with what does
exist in both tables and then delete from that table what does exist in
table1 and you then have what exists in table1 but not in table2, then repeat
process for table2.
this just seems incredibly clumsy and I'm sure there is probably a far
better way to code this.
your help much appreciated.Try,
select *
from
(
select t1.c1, ..., t1.cn
from t1 left join t2
on t1.pk = t2.pk
where t2.pk is null
union
select t2.c1, ..., t2.cn
from t1 right join t2
on t1.pk = t2.pk
where t1.pk is null
)
) as t
If do not mind about duplicated rows, then use "union all" instead.
AMB
"sysbox27" wrote:
> what is the best way of extracting just the rows that existing in both tables
> that are not common to both.
> I guess one way might be to firstly populate another table with what does
> exist in both tables and then delete from that table what does exist in
> table1 and you then have what exists in table1 but not in table2, then repeat
> process for table2.
> this just seems incredibly clumsy and I'm sure there is probably a far
> better way to code this.
> your help much appreciated.
>

extracting from 2 tables what doesn't exist in both

what is the best way of extracting just the rows that existing in both tables
that are not common to both.
I guess one way might be to firstly populate another table with what does
exist in both tables and then delete from that table what does exist in
table1 and you then have what exists in table1 but not in table2, then repeat
process for table2.
this just seems incredibly clumsy and I'm sure there is probably a far
better way to code this.
your help much appreciated.
Try,
select *
from
(
select t1.c1, ..., t1.cn
from t1 left join t2
on t1.pk = t2.pk
where t2.pk is null
union
select t2.c1, ..., t2.cn
from t1 right join t2
on t1.pk = t2.pk
where t1.pk is null
)
) as t
If do not mind about duplicated rows, then use "union all" instead.
AMB
"sysbox27" wrote:

> what is the best way of extracting just the rows that existing in both tables
> that are not common to both.
> I guess one way might be to firstly populate another table with what does
> exist in both tables and then delete from that table what does exist in
> table1 and you then have what exists in table1 but not in table2, then repeat
> process for table2.
> this just seems incredibly clumsy and I'm sure there is probably a far
> better way to code this.
> your help much appreciated.
>