Figure this...
INSERT INTO Recipient (RC_D_ID, RC_C_ID, RC_DATE)
SELECT DISTINCT 20000, subscriber.id_email, GETDATE()
FROM subscriber, Listmember
WHERE Listmember.LM_C_ID = subscriber.id_email
AND ((subscriber.banned = 0
AND subscriber.id_email < 5000000)
AND (Listmember.LM_L_ID = 253))
says ...
648842 rows affected
however...
SELECT DISTINCT 20000, subscriber.id_email, GETDATE()
FROM subscriber, Listmember
WHERE Listmember.LM_C_ID = subscriber.id_email
AND ((subscriber.banned = 0
AND subscriber.id_email < 5000000)
AND (Listmember.LM_L_ID = 253))
only returns 267564
in the Query Analyzer window.
And to top it all off... about 30 minutes after I
noticed it and investigated... it stopped happening.
Now both queries above affect the same number of rows.
This is the 4th time this has happened.
I haven't found any patters in log files or memory
settings or data types of fields.. .etc.
It's a brand new SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition.
6gb ram. Dual 3.06 ghz 1mb cache, Perc4/Dc Raid 10,
on 5x145gb scsi drives.
This problem wasn't happening on standard edition
that we migrated from about a month ago.
Any help would be greatly appreciated."Nick" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Figure this...
> INSERT INTO Recipient (RC_D_ID, RC_C_ID, RC_DATE)
> SELECT DISTINCT 20000, subscriber.id_email, GETDATE()
> FROM subscriber, Listmember
> WHERE Listmember.LM_C_ID = subscriber.id_email
> AND ((subscriber.banned = 0
> AND subscriber.id_email < 5000000)
> AND (Listmember.LM_L_ID = 253))
> says ...
> 648842 rows affected
> however...
> SELECT DISTINCT 20000, subscriber.id_email, GETDATE()
> FROM subscriber, Listmember
> WHERE Listmember.LM_C_ID = subscriber.id_email
> AND ((subscriber.banned = 0
> AND subscriber.id_email < 5000000)
> AND (Listmember.LM_L_ID = 253))
> only returns 267564
> in the Query Analyzer window.
> And to top it all off... about 30 minutes after I
> noticed it and investigated... it stopped happening.
--
Hi Nick,
I would update statistics, free procedure cache and rebuild indexes if I see
inconsistent results like this. I will also review execution plans for any
discrepancies.
Hope this helps,
--
Eric Cárdenas
SQL Server support
No comments:
Post a Comment