Showing posts with label measure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label measure. Show all posts

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Extremely slow median measures

Hi

I'm having a problem with extremely slow median measures.

I've created a named set of all record IDs and wrote the measure as Median( [All Records], [Measures].[Age] ). When I drop a dimension into one of the axes, it takes a very long time to calculate the median even at the top level of the hierarchy, and I suspect it's computing the median for all the members of that dimension, even before I've drilled down into them.

Anyone know a better method for this?

Your formula computes Median for all records always, regardless of the selection in Records dimension.|||

Sorry Mosha, I don't quite follow. I need this to be a generic measure that will return the median of any cell in the client browser. Since median cannot be preaggregated, I thought the only way to do this was to take the median of the set of all records in the current cell. The other option I had explored went something like this:

Median (

{ ( Axis(0)(0)( Axis(0)(0).Count - 1 ).Dimension.CurrentMember.All, [All Records].[ ID ].[ ID ] ) },

[Measures].[Age]

)

But this didn't work at all.

|||Sorry, this time I don't quite follow. What exactly do you mean by the following: "I need this to be a generic measure that will return the median of any cell in the client browser". Median of what ? Perha[s you could illustrate with couple of examples.|||

My mistake... Should have said median of a measure (e.g. age) within any cell in the spreadsheet. For example, if I have a 2 x 2 table with Male and Female as columns and marital status Single and Married as rows, I'd be showing the median age in each of the 4 cells. Other times, users would be interested in the median age for other combinations of factors, say Gender and Cancer, or Cancer and Socioeconomic Status, but they shouldn't have to select a different median measure for each combination. Sort of like a percentage/proportion against any dimension selected on the row/column axis, as discussed in the following post:

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=720160&SiteID=1

|||

If you are guaranteed to always have two axes, then something like that may work

Median(CrossJoin(Axis(0), Axis(1)), Measures.[Age])

|||

Thanks Mosha, but no luck with that one either. There's probably no other way around this; that is, other than using the Fact Table primary key (Record ID) to select the set of all individual age values.

|||

Then I again don't understand your requirements :( Based on what you wrote before:

> For example, if I have a 2 x 2 table with Male and Female as columns and marital status Single and Married as rows, I'd be showing the median age in each of the 4 cells.

The formula that I wrote computes then median of these 4 cells and places it into each one of these 4 cells. I have verified it with AdventureWorks which has Gender and Marital Status attributes...

Extremely slow Excel MDX

Using Excel as a client is most of the time exceedingly slow. For example writing a simple query of the type:

SELECT [Measures].[Some Measure] ON 0,
[Product].[Product-Version].[Product] ON 1
FROM [Cubename]

in Management studio is in Excel transformed to:

SELECT NON EMPTY HIERARCHIZE(AddCalculatedMembers({DrillDownLevel({[Product].[Product-Version].[All]})})) DIMENSION PROPERTIES PARENT_UNIQUE_NAME ON COLUMNS FROM [Cubename] WHERE ([Measures].[Some Measure])

which takes several times longer to execute. As one starts drilling down it becomes increasingly worse with excel producing MDX that takes 100:s of times longer to execute then if I handwrite the mdx. This is with a very simple cube where Some Measure is not a calculated member. I can't even begin to imagine how slow it would be with a more complex cube. Is there anything to be done about this, any guidelines to follow to make it easer for Excel to generate "normal" mdx?

I had similar problem with Excel and OWC when accessing OLAP Cubes. Unfortunately, unless you optimize your cube, there is nothing can be done with how Excel generate mdx to retrieve data. Excel and OWC is closed code, and recently Microsoft announced that they will be stopping new releases for OWC. Howerver, Excel PivotTable has new version, take a look at Office 2007 in Beta version. It generates more efficient MDXs compared to Office 2003/2000.

Downside, it will take another 2-3 years for Office 2007 to be as popular as Office 2003, so, distribution of your solution in Office 2007 might be an issue if u decide to switch to Office 2007 in larger scale enterprise.

|||Thanks. Is there anything special you have in mind when you say "unless you optimize your cube"? Or do you mean the "ordinary" optimizations one does to make the server work decently fast? I will try to have a look at the 2007 beta though.|||

As mentioned earlier, you can take a look at Office 2007 sending bit different MDX queries. You also take a look at the ProClarity recently aquired by Microsoft see if you get better performance using it.

Also make sure you install latest service pack - SP1. There has been some performance improvements in it. You will see event more performance improvements in upcoming service pack 2. Watch for announcements of Community Technology Preview (CTP) to get your hands on upcoming SP2.

Edward.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.